Dear two readers,
return very briefly to the question of the Mass in Latin. On some video of The Republic (of which I use NOT here for membership ideological but purely as a documentary source), we can see the "before" Latin Mass (or re-post) and its "effects".
http://tv.repubblica.it/home_page.php?playmode=player&cont_id=12579
the comments of the faithful. Clearly recognize that they are non-general or generalized: there are four or five against the huge mass of all Catholics. But some of my observations seem to confirm some time ago. Why
appreciate? Answers sparse: it is old because I remember my father died, because it is richer in content (sic - but a language, whatever, is the vehicle or contents?). It is' richer and more dense, says a faithful, as they say in a chocolate cup Cameo of spins.
Who follows turns out to be even better "Who does not know Latin," according to the lord of Militia Christi, and a lady said more clearly "I must learn." And then you feel thanks for this initiative whole earth, and Pope is God and the Madonna (the latter of which we would like to see the signature on the authorization - as well as those who do not want to know when another was to thank Pope took the opposite decision!). It is always a member of the Militia Christi invites us to understand the passion, to see the film by Mel Gibson! (Fortunately, the other lady calls the Holy Scriptures).
The form prevails over substance and form, however, is a harlequin, all made of heterogeneous patches in the post-modern all-mixes, and the Mass, the Bible, movie a few years ago, with the same brush. I repeat: DVD approach.
Maybe in a few centuries there will be a Gibsonia Militia. Where a new Luther?
Valete.
0 comments:
Post a Comment