(... risen to actual post because I took his comments very seriously and I wanted to dissect)
The post made me "angry "
do not need quotation marks, in the post I try to be formal, but the reviews you can loosen, so I'm not shocked. And after that start within the substance facetious ...
Basically I find it unfair, in terms of intellectual honesty, groped to ridicule spirituality of individuals through implied statements that do not need motivation.
So, I believe that those individuals with their way of speaking were the first to become ridiculous. And you should be the first to perceive it as their co-cultivated and prepared. I see that it does not go specifically and do not try to justify the criticism single sentences, which are quite indefensible. Maybe, deep down, there's your irritation, rather than the post for the lean figure that there are gentlemen. See, for example, I'm liberal, but if someone said to be the same, and then babbling nonsense or simply ignorant phrases using the word "liberal," "freedom" as a condiment, I get angry with him. See one of the examples I have chosen to illustrate the second "poison" in the post following the one discussed here.
distinguish the errant and error, as John XXIII said that you quote. We also say that for every argument, there are supporters for each theory more or less prepared and that no one ever talks about always by way of all. But a thesis, by dint of being poorly supported by people confused, it wears out. Furthermore, their confusion can be attributed to individual unpreparedness, but I think it is also a symptom of the fact that this same position has been well publicized without explaining: "now we can say Mass in Latin, but remember that the language is not essential, would take a postilluccia so, but you never listen!
There is a persistent lack of clarity and explanation in addressing the faithful when providing their teaching or promulgation of rules, which has complained recently also by prominent figures of the Church (not by me) about other measures. Remember Cardinal Martini?
Teilhard de Chardin wrote, when once, in China (by more than stupid speditovi), he lacked all the necessary material for the Eucharistic celebration, then began to think that taking the whole Earth as an altar and as host his daily toil. (I apologize if I quote only from memory, about this beautiful reflection that struck me at the time). Well, with thoughts so profound, so true to a perception of the essence of that celebration licks like "I like the old," to praise you would like a cup of hot chocolate, I see a bleak spiritual abyss. Do not you? (No wonder T. AD was an outsider of Catholicism ...)
A method Republic, in fact, conjuring trick.
Look, find those pictures at Republic was a coincidence. The online newspaper did not even use controversial. And I was also surprised me about what those people said, because it confirmed my suspicion expressed in our most discussed post. That is an approach to aesthetic and then surface to mass. I also said that those people do not consider representative of the whole Catholic world ... But one, one that I deny this! A faithful saying and cut net "does not matter, Latin or Italian and transubstantiation that counts." The Lord of the Militia Christi the "good", then makes a sad reminder of a recent movie (and any other issue of equal but with less blood? We understand the passion just because a director has portrayed in a more bold and thanks to special effects developed more?).
see, is including interviews with the Northern League as their rallies ... Maybe there will be a fund that is cultured and mild, but when you hear them speak always pitted samples of various roughness in Italian approximate.
If you want to say that these people "old" is stupid and retrograde (...)
excusat not petita accusatio obvious, I might say, just to go back to Latin ... But yes, I think that people are very limited and superficial and that their superficiality is harmful to Catholicism and is a symptom of a lack of preparation (I gamble, eh?) Driven. Why the lack of preparedness on the Mass can also be harmless and at most affect folklore, but then is an attitude that you get used to, and under which Marsh will end up many other, more harmful deviations.
not say instead that it is "backward" because they do not use time as a yardstick - "you mean more old stuff to listen to about six." In fact, the polemic against the Latin Mass and the reactions to it (I never tire of repeating) is not due to the fact that the Mass or the language they are "old." Even then, liberalism, despite not boast duemilaesette candles, Young is not young!
speak ill of militia christi implying the reasons and want to join in this opinion, the reintroduction of the liturgy of John XXIII, trying to say that the reform is appreciated by these people is really a partisan maneuver.
Well, who "tries to say it"? I tell them!
then I'll tell you that I do not even know her, MC, I thought then and there were some companies that benefit my blissful ignorance ...! Then son was thrilled to read their site, so much so that I wrote a special post. And you what do you think of their approach? Of ideological quell'impasto where all is not really gospel, their fascist lexicon?
the author would do better to expose themselves personally in the reviews because that, rather than to a Liberal Democrat looks like a type Rosi Bindi, a type of cunning Prodi, in fact, which is difficult to answer because it aims not to compare but to give precedence to the views of the author, an arrogance, exactly.
not collect the comparison, stating that the eminent politicians. I put a video and I said that is not a statistic, does not seem to have used some kind of subtle subterfuges ... If anything, the post was somewhat elliptical because it comes as a complement to the previous year. Exhibit
you rather! Tell me that these gentlemen are (at least) tenderness, speaking with great confusion and disheartening ... comment on the Militia Christi ...
With consideration.
0 comments:
Post a Comment