Milena Velbafree Movies

Barry




was a Republican. But it had nothing to do with half notches today's neocons. He was a conservative, but had very clear what was important to preserve and issues around which ones the company should open up. And above all gave great kick in the ass of the bigots that in order to impose their sectarian conception of life and politics wanted to restrict the freedoms that are the basis of size West (and in my opinion - beyond all - keep it still great). If
today in the political world the conservative right and, more generally, were represented primarily by people like Barry Goldwater, as Rudy Giuliani, in short, people who favor free-market, zero tolerance against crime, but also civil liberties and a secular vision and secular politics, well, needless to say, the undersigned declares proudly conservative. But pity that today the situation is not at all like that.
But hope with all my heart that triumphs in 2008, Giuliani, I want to list some of the statements of Barry Goldwater that summarize well il suo pensiero. Sarei veramente curioso oggi di sentire cosa direbbe dell'estremismo religioso imperante in gran parte del mondo e soprattutto del terrorismo che rappresenta il vero cancro della nostra epoca.


"On religious issues there can be little or no compromise. There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ, or God, or Allah, or whatever one calls this supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God's name on one's behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both.
I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in "A," "B," "C" and "D." Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me?
And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate.
I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of "conservatism."
Speech in the US Senate (16 September 1981)


"I think every good Christian ought to kick Falwell right in the ass."
July, 1981, in response to Moral Majority founder Jerry Falwell's opposition to the nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court, of which Falwell had said, "Every good Christian should be concerned."—Ed Magnuson, Time Magazine, The Brethren's First Sister, July 20, 1981. Retrieved 1/1/07.


"My faith in the future rests squarely on the belief that man, if he doesn't first destroy himself, will find new answers in the universe, new technologies, new disciplines, which will contribute to a vastly different and better world in the twenty-first century. Recalling what has happened in my short lifetime in the fields of communication and transportation and the life sciences, I marvel at the pessimists who tell us that we have reached the end of our productive capacity, who project a future of primarily dividing up what we now have and making do with less. To my mind the single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom."
With No Apologies (1979)



"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
Acceptance Speech as the 1964 Republican Presidential candidate.


"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people just because they're gay, you don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay. And that's what brings me into it."

Eppoi questa è davvero geniale:

"You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight"

Samaire Armstrong 2010

I miss you Just to make things clear





"Fuck Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, and backward-ass, cave-dwelling, Fundamentalist assholes everywhere. On the names of Murdered Thousands innocent, I pray you spend the rest of eternity with your seventy-two whores roasting in a jet-fueled fire in hell. You towel headed camel jockeys can kiss my royal, Irish ass! "
The 25th Hour - Spike Lee

How To Get In Basketball Shape

Answer A Few open to a kind reader on status of women (and girls) in Islam


Dear friend, Welcome
. I read carefully your answer. I do not think we are so far away As for ideas, at least not on every point. You're right, for example, on women commodified, the carriers of ass I mentioned in my previous post (note linguistic thought that the spelling of words continues to emphasize the word Job !) fact, women are objectified and sadly reduced to a fraction of their own physical . I did notice that the first give opinions on this or that body part is something human, and on the other hand, wanted to be strictly against even a beauty contest should irritate the eyes. Not deny that Muslim men also have their fees in order to judge a woman "piece by piece" even if it remains "the street" and has not yet arrived at a program that gives prominence to the thing. And I guess also some Muslim women to judge when the man "in pieces". (For example, the beloved and popular singer Amr Diab has not stooped and stortignaccolo, far from it - is due only to the beautiful voice of its success?). So from a purely physical side of the appreciation of the buttocks is not necessarily a sign of decadence, and, if it is a sign of decadence as a single body part is used as the sole yardstick of a person, this you still even in Islamic countries. In short, played down a bit '.

to topics deeper, which ignore the specific issue of the buttocks exhibited on television. We talk about the status of women in Islam . You're right on unreliable yardstick that is used for assessment of the freedom of women and myopic carelessness which might be incurred in doing so. The woman is no longer free as can be discovered. Nor is achieved as can go, or in fact rises, the steps of the hierarchy of a company or a state. I am the son of a housewife who gave up working to better follow up my education and has a rich spiritual life, much more, I think, of some minister or some manager - from a similar flaw of reasoning I feel free. and Westerners forget the surface. But you too are floating: if you were in a consistent relativist ("Muslim women have a meter, the Western another, and each is happy with what he ") should not even ask if there are so many in prominent places in the Western policy not name any women in positions of success. If you are consistent with the reasoning of the" two meters "questions that are irrelevant. Anyway, the answer is, women in politics in the Arab world there are, yes, I know at least of those in Egypt, but before they see a presidential (such as Thatcher, as the Merkel) of a State can expect to come back to the Prophet.

specification, however, one thing if there was an absolute yardstick , and based on what emerged that women in Medio Oriente sono “meno realizzate”, ebbene questo non giustificherebbe alcuna aggressione da parte dall’Occidente . Lo dico per limitare il discorso alla mera discussione sulla condizione della donna perché è chiaro che molti compiono una serie di passaggi argomentativi e ideologici del tipo “la donna nella società islamica è inferiore” ergo “la società islamica in toto è inferiore” ergo “si può / si deve attaccare la società islamica con la violenza o con altri mezzi”. Non sono così rozzo.

Hai anche ragione sulla paradossale modernità del Corano a cui nessuno pensa, di primo acchito. The Koran was a big improvement, an excellent innovation, from a legal standpoint. For example he rails against the use horrible murder of female babies, in force in the time before the Prophet, that the revelations erased. The company's pre-Islamic women do not fare well at all (but still - the first wife of the Prophet, Khadija, was a rich merchant, a widow. This is another point that may reflect).

But is this that I think the strongest argument, and I want us to be focused on this. You talk too of respect for women. If you admit that women can be respected (whatever is meant by respect), also admit that there are also cases in cui la donna può NON essere rispettata E questo può purtroppo accadere anche nell’ambito famigliare - pure il Corano menziona l’eventualità di maltrattamenti da parte dal marito (vedi IV,128). Ebbene, in questo caso si misura la libertà e la tutela della donna (quindi il rispetto stesso!) dalla facilità che la donna ha di liberarsi del non rispetto di cui potrebbe trovarsi ad essere vittima. E qui si cade; perché le leggi islamiche nel divorzio favoriscono inesorabilmente il marito. Questo non è nemmeno uno di quei punti ambigui, moderabili (si sa che il Corano ha infatti versetti che ne abrogano o almeno mitigano altri), ma è scritto, e salmodiato, chiaro e tondo. Il divorzio islamico, stando alle parole del Corano che ha pure una sura (la LXV) che ne prende il nome, è, sì, meno brutale di quanto si pensi ; c’è un periodo di riflessione che l’uomo deve rispettare perché potrebbe voler ritornare su suoi passi, poi la donna deve ricevere il necessario per la sussistenza, e infine si parla di trattare la ripudiata con gentilezza -il che fu un enorme miglioramento rispetto alla società venuta prima del Profeta. Ma si parla di ripudio solo come un atto che può provenire dal maschio.

Questo ha conseguenze non trascurabili. Se un uomo maltratta la moglie questa non può liberarsene facilmente, repudiation must obtain the consent of him ...! Take then a social mechanism flawed. Unlikely that the man agrees, as the divorce is at least a nuisance, it is also not socially honorable, prompting gossips and rumors (like us). If instead of giving consent, you invent some responsibility that falls on women. Politics of the lesser evil: if social disapproval must be at least that is seen as the wife who was wrong. And if that is the fault of the wife, or that a bad wife, his legal position further expires. Just as the people's opinion about her, which is also influential with regard to the chances that went to remarry, is not a minor issue: after you've been the victim of a "lack of respect", as you can get out heads held high? How can rifarti if you are a divorcee?

There is a one-way, an imbalance in the Islamic divorce in marriage but in general, which has never considered carefully. Women praising Islam, belonging, and underestimate this point, or are living according to Islamic laws Western (because translated, because immigrants) or living in Islamic law but selfishly and think naively that it is irrelevant because both their husband could never give them reason to want divorce: in any case a form of selfishness and shortsightedness. Note that the imbalance that exists in marriage is also reflected in its beginning, since it is not the woman he chooses. And this is a point not to be overlooked.

then tell me who you roll with laughter reading that I think that an imam "nuisance", as if it were my innocence ... The imam (another word that emphasizes word! You should do a study of cultural anthropology, this ) imams, I said, this business, "you have to behave as a" deal indeed. Not necessarily good. If you want to use then unfortunately the bad hard for anyone to stop them. You can not deny their very strong social role and not always positive.

return to the issue of women in relation to this last point in the Arab world if there were measures that have been carried out to protect more and more women regarding divorce, are certainly not been carried out by the imam. The woman, in society which they control, and respect (at least according to criteria intra-Islamic), however, "men are a step higher" God's words through the mouth of Muhammad (Sura II, 228). If it is argued on this basis it is difficult then you should consider the status of women as something which can be modified. and real estate is not mai un valore positivo. Rispetto vuol dire non solo garantire una condizione ma anche problematizzarla, metterla in discussione, sapersi chiedere se va bene così o se per caso non si può fare qualcosa di più - però se si è convinti che la condizione è quella perfetta, in quanto stabilita da Dio, non vi si pone mai mente in modo flessibile. La si dà per scontata. Dare per scontato qualcosa non vuol dire prenderlo sul serio.

Un'altra riflessione, sempre in questa vena. Parliamo di chi vive non con addosso il semplice velo, ma completamente coperta . Una donna celata da un niqab è sì tutelata da certe osservazioni pesanti o dal condizionamento esteriore e superficiali da parte della moda. Non corre il rischio di essere come quelle tristi ragazzotte di Salsomaggiore. Ma è anche una donna di cui non puoi vedere se piange, o se è pallida perché sta male, è un essere a cui tu (uomo o donna) non puoi offrire il tuo aiuto - perché non ti accorgi facilmente che ne necessita! Vi rendete conto della distorsione percettiva e quindi delle idee, della sensibilità , che è indotta dalla pratica di coprire le donne dalla testa ai piedi? Come si fa relazionarsi alla donna con consapevolezza se le "donne" sono innanzitutto "quelle di casa mia" e per il resto sono "quell'insieme indistinto di esseri coperti di stoffa che vedi fuori"? Which have a face only within the walls of the house, you think so "if they have problems they will think their fathers or husbands?. I find that full coverage is a double edged sword, protecting, yes, it can be argued with some effectiveness, but also leaves terribly alone, and leads to being ignored by others. This meant when he spoke of "negative identity" because of burqa or niqab . I do not think an argument can be easily settled. Or, again, it is assumed that a woman will not stand evil, will never have a hardship, and that if everything has to be solved and can be solved in the family? Or they will say "Well, if una donna ha bisogno di aiuto te lo chiede?". Miseri, egoistici ragionamenti...

Un altro paio di notazioni: se si dice che la donna coprendosi, è protetta e rispettata, questo significa anche che si ha una concezione non lusinghiera del maschio, come se potenzialmente la visione di qualunque porzione di pelle femminile scoperta facesse di lui un bruto, come se l'irrispetto fosse una tendenza irrefrenabile il cui scatenarsi è direttamente proporzionale alla visibilità del corpo femminile. Ben misera visione allora! Oppure la donna è coperta perché sia vista solo da uno, il marito? Quindi nel matrimonio la donna è cosa del marito?

Si noti che sto parlando della copertura totale, which, however, is not uniquely prescribed by the Koran , which orders the use of cloaks ( jilbaab - XXXIII, 59), and cover the "beautiful pieces" (XXIV, 31). So then a fundamentalist tradition, to be sure, (and, I suspect, even for the socially caged woman), has seen fit to cover all . Instead, I believe that the veil (and sober clothing: I'm not at all supporting a put from Salsomaggiore!) is acceptable, provided that take is the result of genuine choice , and tell you more, a position that perhaps scontenterà some, even if I have strong objections as compared to religion, I also accept it pragmatically in schools.

We finally an example of inaction harmful, returning on ' infibulation (also corrects word word ...) which you are silent, perhaps because you are uninformed. (And if you are not, I wish you were expressing in this regard). And 'a practice that has no basis in the Koran (and which may also be adopted by the Christians of those latitudes, which is why the title would have been better to speak of Arab society in general). in the practice of stitching or female genital mutilation, performed on girls (and therefore is imposed, because per le bambine non si può parlare di scelta consapevole). Non c’è paragone con la circoncisione (anch’essa peraltro discutibile) in quanto è molto più dolorosa e nociva alla salute - se non vogliamo parlare della vita sessuale anche solo dal punto di vista della meccanica dell'atto riproduttivo e non del piacere . Essa è almeno in alcuni Stati formalmente proibita. La conseguenza è che la si pratica negli ospedali sottobanco, o la effettuano delle praticone di villaggio prive della benché minima nozione di anatomia e di profilassi - ammesso e non concesso che una mutilazione genitale in ambiente antisettico e in anestesia sia accettabile. Questa pratica, lo ripeto, non ha base coranica ma solo una ambiguous justification in tradition. Well, I bet that the initiatives that led to the formal prohibition ineffective, again!) Of this practice have not been carried out mainly by the imams, who also should not just keep the word of God but also distinguish it from spurious additions; and all this if we really want to put it in terms of religion without considering the suffering of the maimed, which are obviously the most important thing . And I suspect also that the principle of opposition to this practice, although it is not widespread among the imams.

The argument is far from exhausted, but for now here hoping to term enough to have clarified my position and have provided some food for thought in more.

Thanks again for having given me this opportunity and soon, to your blog.

Plus One Protocol For Weddings

Butts, Headwear & Skulls



The reading part of a noble and popular colleague in the blogosphere (http://salamelik.blogspot.com/2007/09/le-schiave-del-lato-b. html), it seems to us that shares the love of longish work yes, but arguments, it suggests reflections on Islam and its social implications which, oddly enough, we just treated.

I do not want my lines are a replacement part mentioned, which I invite you to read. Allow me to summarize the basic steps, however, because those are characteristic of a certain line of reasoning power. In two words: it takes its cue from the recent episode missitaliota jurors seeking to better assess the ass (word lecitissima, unnecessary use euphemisms) of candidates. From this it is an analogy: these poor girls, they're just taken for a ride, worse, taken as carriers of ass , evaluated according to it alone, are slaves of a mechanism that favors emulation and the only beauty demeans women. We then move on to the company of the veil: the women want to criticize because you would be treated like slaves - so proceeds controcritica - while it is in your society makes women slaves "of the B-side". That is precisely the ass.

I begin to lightly by playing down the first episode of the buttocks. Nothing new there where the sun beats, you know? appreciation of physical beauty is not "superficial" is something human, very human. One of the attributes of Aphrodite was thousands of years ago, and without that interest you samples of any kind, Callipigia , or (putting aside modesty Professorin from the gymnasium), "the ass". There are parts of the body that are coded as attractive, erotic. And I coded it could also be observed that vary from age to age, I mentioned Venus, but it is known that in other times they have made lavish praise of the crown, or ankles (although perhaps you were thinking of something else, but who can say it?). I remember seeing a picture of a winner of many years ago (maybe the Bose) that you could see the axillary hair, nowadays banned. I remember when the original was still praising the ass of a male (and there is a funny joke in this regard, I think, in When Harry Met Sally ). Your ass is probably still a bit 'taboo because it has more to do with the "bottom", with the "backside", with feces insomma, mentre il seno, essendo in alto e legato al “latte” è più nobile. In realtà, allora, se ce la si vuole prendere con la riduzione di una persona a una parte del corpo, basterebbe Miss Italia in sé che è un concorso di bellezza fisica, basterebbe l’apprezzamento del seno, che però non fa notizia perché è dato per scontato. O anche solo degli occhi: che però la tradizione nobilità in quanto specchio dell'anima, quindi più spirituali. Eppure son parte del corpo quanto il culo! Quindi il comportamento dei giurati è del tutto coerente con il contesto e per nulla nuovo. Lo prendo come un fenomeno umano tra i tanti e per giunta assai banale.

Ma veniamo al parallelo with the Islamic society. I do not experience a surface with some Islamic countries. I know in particular Egypt as I had the privilege to teach you Italian, enjoying contact with the local culture that is not what the tourists going to roast her buttocks in Sharm. I have more than discrete elements of literary Arabic and Egyptian dialect. I have read (in translation) the Koran while living in a country whose culture is steeped in it, with the advantage of direct feedback and to ask questions to my fellow teachers (Egypt). All this not to talk to me but to let you know that my opinion is not traced to what I read in the papers or worse on the books of Oriana Fallaci.

I will tell you, then, that even men out there appreciate the forms, perhaps even more than us because they went through a trend that has emerged as attractive anorexics. Where is, moreover, belly dancing? Norway perhaps? In the Arab tradition, there are clearly defined standards of beauty perpetuated today, and some men know no more of our young ladies that there are latitudes, perhaps with the excuse of a language course, to recycle a bit ', enjoying a renewed success thanks to the forms that we would be already judged beyond measure. I say all this, mind you, not because I think the bad thing, but to stress an analogy. In addition even the Western model itself imposes itself: the music videos of singers who warble overflowing their "habibi y", "my love" while performing generous necklines. Amr Diab, to see what the other side, is a popular singer who stands out as a great big man. This

to mitigate the difference. But the keen criticism is as follows. The famous "veil" that strace is not so much the object itself - apart from the fact that with this name then you end up with reference to the much wider piece of fabric rather than a simple hat (the infamous burqa or niqab ) versions denying the identity and give also a considerable number of practical problems. Well, I said, not the veil itself, but the complex society that expresses it. And in that society is very difficult to talk about free choice by women.

There is a choice, if anything, a very small minority of wealthy people, who now return to the veil, for a process of recovery is proud past, in turn, through a phase of abandonment due to westernization as freely choice, ie emulation - emulation which means choice before a range of possibilities. When the West was still seen as a positive model, because of its technological triumph, and, there was a feeling of inferiority, is looking for a way to take the best remaining faithful to their cultural origins. Egyptian development, use of Arabic, but abandoned galabyya (the robe that even today in southern Egypt is the most popular). All this I did not invent, but the author describes such a tender certainly not true the contemporary West, Galal Amin, in his well-known books on "What happened to the Egyptians?". The discourse of "free choice" is also, nowadays, for many Muslim immigrants, who have seen the alternative and have consciously chosen.

But the majority of women there, bare-headed or not - and I'm talking about a country known as a moderate! - Is still encased in a system of subordination with respect to which knows no alternative. A system, for example, arranged marriages, in which women are judged on the basis of economic and aesthetic canons - the latter not unlike those evoked about Salsomaggiore. And the man too.

And then I will not dwell on the terrible genital mutilation (of which even less of ourselves because we talk about the vagina is even made taboo buttocks!), Which concerns, amongst other things, the children of Christians ( without a shred of justification in any scripture ) shall be a painful task imposed on small, completely unnecessary from the medical point of view, often a harbinger of disease. And he talks about a girls, which for obvious reasons do not choose with some personal knowledge of the facts . I do not make analogies with the piercing you, please, that at best is a bit ugly or 'idiot. Here we talk about a mutilation harmful tax, which has its base on the female bias. It feels so women who return after reflection, the veil, but no recoveries that the stitching of the genitals. Neither the arranged marriage seems to have never given rise to great nostalgia, nor for males or for females.

I am sorry for the boy's ass because it reduces to that, yes. Or laugh at. But I can do it because I know that reducing contrasts, such as choosing less happy, compared with a range of alternatives that I think the most noble and less ephemeral in our open society to a young woman, studying, self-realization hill gifts of intellect in short, the value of what is in the skull and not on it or to its opposite extreme. Potential alternatives that I have not seen as widespread in Egypt and elsewhere. There are, for charity. But not so much. It expresses the mentality that - among other things-even the veil, the spread of those alternatives are not favoring it at all. And I apologize if the speech is a bit 'dry. also particularly significant, the ass that these girls are not reduced for allegedly discovered God's command is debatable, it is possible to convince the girls groped in question to choose something else - as demonstrated by the same polemical intervention . And do not run into anything, no social ostracism, no imam takes umbrage.

's easy, easy come and take an analogy, describing two behaviors (women on one side of the veil, the other carriers of ass) and then say that the mechanism is the same and that even those in the ass are far more slaves, emphasizing a metaphor. But it is very honest and faithful to complexity of the facts. Not hide behind a thin veil.


Ila-Liqa

How Quickly Does Chlamydia Show

response italic Aftershave


(... risen to actual post because I took his comments very seriously and I wanted to dissect)

The post made me "angry "

do not need quotation marks, in the post I try to be formal, but the reviews you can loosen, so I'm not shocked. And after that start within the substance facetious ...

Basically I find it unfair, in terms of intellectual honesty, groped to ridicule spirituality of individuals through implied statements that do not need motivation.

So, I believe that those individuals with their way of speaking were the first to become ridiculous. And you should be the first to perceive it as their co-cultivated and prepared. I see that it does not go specifically and do not try to justify the criticism single sentences, which are quite indefensible. Maybe, deep down, there's your irritation, rather than the post for the lean figure that there are gentlemen. See, for example, I'm liberal, but if someone said to be the same, and then babbling nonsense or simply ignorant phrases using the word "liberal," "freedom" as a condiment, I get angry with him. See one of the examples I have chosen to illustrate the second "poison" in the post following the one discussed here.

distinguish the errant and error, as John XXIII said that you quote. We also say that for every argument, there are supporters for each theory more or less prepared and that no one ever talks about always by way of all. But a thesis, by dint of being poorly supported by people confused, it wears out. Furthermore, their confusion can be attributed to individual unpreparedness, but I think it is also a symptom of the fact that this same position has been well publicized without explaining: "now we can say Mass in Latin, but remember that the language is not essential, would take a postilluccia so, but you never listen!

There is a persistent lack of clarity and explanation in addressing the faithful when providing their teaching or promulgation of rules, which has complained recently also by prominent figures of the Church (not by me) about other measures. Remember Cardinal Martini?

Teilhard de Chardin wrote, when once, in China (by more than stupid speditovi), he lacked all the necessary material for the Eucharistic celebration, then began to think that taking the whole Earth as an altar and as host his daily toil. (I apologize if I quote only from memory, about this beautiful reflection that struck me at the time). Well, with thoughts so profound, so true to a perception of the essence of that celebration licks like "I like the old," to praise you would like a cup of hot chocolate, I see a bleak spiritual abyss. Do not you? (No wonder T. AD was an outsider of Catholicism ...)

A method Republic, in fact, conjuring trick.

Look, find those pictures at Republic was a coincidence. The online newspaper did not even use controversial. And I was also surprised me about what those people said, because it confirmed my suspicion expressed in our most discussed post. That is an approach to aesthetic and then surface to mass. I also said that those people do not consider representative of the whole Catholic world ... But one, one that I deny this! A faithful saying and cut net "does not matter, Latin or Italian and transubstantiation that counts." The Lord of the Militia Christi the "good", then makes a sad reminder of a recent movie (and any other issue of equal but with less blood? We understand the passion just because a director has portrayed in a more bold and thanks to special effects developed more?).

see, is including interviews with the Northern League as their rallies ... Maybe there will be a fund that is cultured and mild, but when you hear them speak always pitted samples of various roughness in Italian approximate.

If you want to say that these people "old" is stupid and retrograde (...)

excusat not petita accusatio obvious, I might say, just to go back to Latin ... But yes, I think that people are very limited and superficial and that their superficiality is harmful to Catholicism and is a symptom of a lack of preparation (I gamble, eh?) Driven. Why the lack of preparedness on the Mass can also be harmless and at most affect folklore, but then is an attitude that you get used to, and under which Marsh will end up many other, more harmful deviations.

not say instead that it is "backward" because they do not use time as a yardstick - "you mean more old stuff to listen to about six." In fact, the polemic against the Latin Mass and the reactions to it (I never tire of repeating) is not due to the fact that the Mass or the language they are "old." Even then, liberalism, despite not boast duemilaesette candles, Young is not young!

speak ill of militia christi implying the reasons and want to join in this opinion, the reintroduction of the liturgy of John XXIII, trying to say that the reform is appreciated by these people is really a partisan maneuver.

Well, who "tries to say it"? I tell them!
then I'll tell you that I do not even know her, MC, I thought then and there were some companies that benefit my blissful ignorance ...! Then son was thrilled to read their site, so much so that I wrote a special post. And you what do you think of their approach? Of ideological quell'impasto where all is not really gospel, their fascist lexicon?

the author would do better to expose themselves personally in the reviews because that, rather than to a Liberal Democrat looks like a type Rosi Bindi, a type of cunning Prodi, in fact, which is difficult to answer because it aims not to compare but to give precedence to the views of the author, an arrogance, exactly.

not collect the comparison, stating that the eminent politicians. I put a video and I said that is not a statistic, does not seem to have used some kind of subtle subterfuges ... If anything, the post was somewhat elliptical because it comes as a complement to the previous year. Exhibit

you rather! Tell me that these gentlemen are (at least) tenderness, speaking with great confusion and disheartening ... comment on the Militia Christi ...

With consideration.

Generic Wedding Thankyou

THE SHAPE OF WATER




or irritation for a certain kind of criticism often move to Beppe Grillo

Since I do not want to talk just like old statues of Marx or of bizarre beasts like the Militia Christi , I think it is appropriate to say a few words sull'exploit Beppe Grillo. Or rather on the reactions that have aroused.

Beppe Grillo V-Day with her can be analyzed in many ways. I Beiderbecke and we discussed the other day - not all the tests have resulted in a positive verdict. Perhaps it would be to dedicate a post well-considered in the next tempi.

C’è però una critica dalla quale dissento fin da subito. Indipendentemente da che cosa si pensi, nello specifico, delle proposte dell’arzillo genovese, del suo stile, della sua efficacia, delle sue prospettive e tutto il resto, che cosa mai vuol dire il commento “La politica si fa all’interno delle istituzioni” con cui ultimamente si troncano i discorsi su di lui? Lo abbiamo sentito anche oggi dal Senatore a Vita Ciampi, che tiene dietro a Napolitano e a vari altri. E c’è da scommetterci che lo risentiremo, se non altro perché quegli augusti vegliardi colla loro autorevolezza destano sempre fenomeni imitativi.

Ebbene, scusate ma per me è un gioco di parole. Institutions are structures which in turn are filled by those who rises to power. They are the containers in which you put the water. It 's true that Grillo hopes also structural changes, but I do not think differently from what they did or do other political parties, the election campaign (like the one where Grillo) because once the government. They did or how he or promoting even greater changes. Only expressed in a more elegant, belonged to the caste (to adopt a term that seems acceptable) and they did not open his mouth and acting President Emeritus. Dog does not eat dog meat.

What kind of water is everyone deems as Grillo vuole: se acqua fresca, se acqua ragia, lo dirà comunque il tempo. Ma enfatizzare che voglia cambiare i contenitori (soprattutto se non si considerano solo i temi del V-Day, ma per intero tutti quelli sollevati in vari anni) mi sembra una riduzione intenzionale e retorica.

In fondo, il termine “istituzioni” è un discussion stopper - è come i morti, di cui non si può dir male (e invece si può benissimo). Tutto questo cianciare di istituzioni e di “luoghi tradizionali” della politica in cui “si deve rimanere” è solo un modo per dire “lasciate che ci rimaniamo noi!”. E scusate se sono osservazioni secche ed elementari.

Valete .

How Long Does It Take Wry Neck To Go

Partibus De Animalium [1]. The Militia Christi



Da cosa nasce cosa. Guardando il filmato sulla ritrovata messa in latino che ho commentato qualche giorno fa mi ha incuriosito la menzione, da parte di un suo affiliato, della Militia Christi (un soldato, dunque, a dispetto dell’aria bonacciona). Poiché da costui proveniva un consiglio tanto sgangherato come quello di capire la Passione di Cristo attraverso l’omonimo film di Mel Gibson (con buona pace di altri autorevoli filmoni sul tema), ho voluto scoprire in quale alveo e da quale fonte scorresse mai un tal fiume di dottrina.

Detto, fatto: mi sono letto testi e guardato foto del sito http://www.militiachristi.it/ find things sufficient to substantiate a post with which to inaugurate a new series controversy, which he called De Animalium Partibus . Series devoted to the identification and dissection of the strange hybrid ideological fantasies bizarre or dangerous dinosaurs they are, embodied by individuals or groups who, with their jumble of badly assembled and pieces that should be extinct for a long time, fans seem almost noble creatures the major parties.

For Sidera not want to substitute is a wiki, so I will not give you a detailed summary of the history of CD, and its ideological tenets, which in fact I invite you to read directly. I briefly describe the spirit like a breath of ideology even worse that of the Concordat. That was Mussolini signed a full understanding of its instrumental value ("Since we agree with the Pope still dominates the consciousness of 100 million people" - Speech in the House on May 5, 1929) and here we refer to visceral enthusiastic membership , the sovereignty of Christ, which should translate from the individual domain of the heart (cf. the standard of the MC), in (wish to) political rule exercised by one who is the vicar of the Nazarene on earth - starting, ça va sans say, from Rome, caput mundi and Italy. On this website, in which King writes, De Amicis, with a capital letter (but "yes" without an accent, judging from banner), the word refers preferably to the Roman Pontiff.

Strange strabismus and mixtures emerge. Although we want to bring out the strangeness of Pius XII to the persecution of the Jews (http://www.militiachristi.it/Riflessioni_e_Formazione_art._7.hm), then you have done with a convergence of the (neo) fascism: in style, in From the Gothic name, in the lexicon ("to honor fallen papal") in the topics: no vehement to unmarried couples, immigration, abortion, etc., all presented as constituting an imminent threat that would counter the militancy in fact 'Army Anointed. Who would want to do some 'of comparative spazzaturistica could be pointed out the enormous similarities with Forza Nuova (http://www.forzanuova.org/), such as anti-Masonic obsession that is reminiscent of similar Benito (the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy pluto-...).

learn then wiki says that the movement "but Catholic-Jewish." Good Catholics will feel free from anti-Semitism, in reading this specification, that generations of women who have tried non blondes in listening to the Navy, "but notice cute" (which is actually a fine scriptural quotation).

Other sights. He insists that the tenets of faith are perfectly grasped by common sense, and then quotes una qualcosa di evidente e universale e sempre esistito come l’infallibilità papale. Non si può dire però che il sito della MC sia superficiale: qui le cose si argomentano e si spiegano fin nei minimi particolari… Impariamo ad esempio da una nota a un testo di un certo spessore (http://www.militiachristi.it/Riflessioni_e_Formazione_art._6.htm) che “La gnoseologia è quella branchia della filosofia che studia la conoscenza umana.” Per tacer delle pinne. Con questa notazione termino dunque in perfetta coerenza tematica questo primo articolo del triste bestiario, per il quale si accettano suggerimenti e candidature.

Valete .

Wards Ap Bio Lab 5 Questions

Three deadly poisons




positions that we like to defend, by force of argument, and we would like to see done, are known. Let me now, thinking about a more general level, to identify three attitudes or three provisions (leggetene, then call them what you will) that correspond to three fatal impediment to any discussion, any dialogue, any possibility of change. Apart from the fact that you defend positions similar to ours or not, I hope that you realize that is not good to anyone (except to those who intentionally uses it, spreading them to defend their privileges) and you will agree with the label "Three poisons". It is unfortunately very common poisons.


First venom: "Are all words"

This attitude goes well with laziness and is found generally in people who feel insecure with their knowledge, skills, or dialectic, or been disappointed by promises betrayed ( it is frequently found in the voters of Berlusconi, and it is a symptom which can be identified despite the reluctance force in Italy since the previous vote. But in a little 'things confusing).

is the distrust of discussion and communication. When you feel even a little 'thinking of others in the correctness of the bubble is now a product Minutes so well made, but for this to be regarded with suspicion or as ineffective, "are all words," indeed.

Oh no. Words, we know, we are the most inflated. But they are also all we have, because our reason is discursive (I will not embark on any big philosophical thesis, but have you ever noticed that animals do not discuss?). Words are made so the Mein Kampf and Red Book as the Divine Comedy and Constitution. Words are not only what we hear, but what we think. And then we do. We must not forget this direct relationship. Who wants or words of warning switch to other media or despises the only constructive and analytical tool that we have many issues (especially ethical). Who despise because they fear verbal deception actually despises its name and is unsure of himself. Who will surrender to the lungs to breathe for fear of something smelly or even toxic?

According poison Ignorance property

use of reason does not know not only those who reject the use but also those who can not substantiate. Many know how to defend their positions by arguing not so much as doing a poor use of words. Or using them on the basis of steps taken for granted, easy equations slogans. On those you testify and there is nothing that they grade, even if "move" means to lead a defense down in the space of reasons and look up definitions, and support a thesis. Repeated at most change the order of terms, with sad and inane ars combinatorial .

Three examples. (1) It goes without someone tell me that homosexuality is "against nature", if you do not tell me what "kind" means. [NB: seems easy!] (2) Needless to declare someone a "liberal" if it has no corresponding concept of "freedom", or something that is not just an instinctive appreciation for the word "freedom", which of course, "sounds good" (Such as "democracy" in fact there always is quick to make us the names of any party). [NB: seems easy!] (3) Needless to state that someone is "Catholic" if they do not tell me the dogmas in which, by definition, a Catholic is to believe (and that differentiate it from a Protestant, for example, or a Orthodox). As the Immaculate Conception. Or employment. [NB: seems easy!]

And so on.

poison Third: The game

Pollyanna Pollyanna will not have forgotten, sugar protagonist of many a book and, above all, of a Disney family film. She, to whom or to whose knowledge captain misfortunes more or less serious, he always found a way to console himself, thinking the worst that could happen and that had not occurred. Wishing to receive such a doll in the mail and getting the other hand, for an exchange, a pair of crutches, he consoled himself for the disappointment, the girl may think we did not need those crutches. This way of seeing things was called "The Game of happiness." Well, apparently not passed on to the small biondocrinita little head, perhaps, that it would have been able to get her longed-doll if she complained. Or, even better, he would try also giving away those crutches happiness to a needy person.

We come to us many times you hear say that, basically, you feel good, that nobody should complain. All right, yes. Nobody says that we are with the water in the throat and that Italy is getting bad. We also unnecessary and perhaps more. But note, first, that anger does not correspond well to both spiritual progress (also a Catholic, mutatis mutandis may subscribe to this statement!) Or diffusion of knowledge, and generosity. In addition, we often do not realize what could be improved. To fare better than someone else is not a good reason to think we have come to perfection. Note that the argument ("Why fight for the law X? Basically we are not not bad") is often and gladly camped by those who recognize that the law X yes, bring some benefit to someone, but he believes in personally do not need it, or not having to have never needed in the future so that this poison is a direct distillation of intellectual myopia, selfishness and laziness.

Valete.

Dickies Outlets Singapore

religion, liberalism and intolerance



Whenever I discuss religion, church, religion and way of living with a Catholic friend, I fall for an average of arms: there is nothing more futile and frustrating than trying to show certain things to those who consider granite topics as untouchables and leaves no room ad alcuna dialettica. Ci tengo a premettere che io NON sono anticlericale, credo fermamente nella libertà di professare il proprio culto, qualunque esso sia nella maniera che si preferisce. Credo anche nella libera manifestazione del pensiero, cardine della società occidentale nata dal liberalismo classico, e quindi ritengo che sia un diritto sacrosanto professare un'idea quanto dire tutto il male possibile su di essa.

In quanto liberale, io sono un convinto assertore della laicità intesa come libertà (sempre entro i limiti inderogabili del c.d. primicipio del "neminem laedere") di non essere obbligati a sottostare ad imperativi morali ed a condotte di vita che non si condividono.
Quindi quando parlo in modo pesantemente critico of a religion, especially of those religions that I think today is getting worse global quality of life in the world (Islam in the first place, then follow Catholicism), I merely challenge their pervasiveness, their continued willingness want to impose on all of its moral precepts. A wise believer will reply, "Yes, for me the religious precepts are an expression of absolute truth, then - as an absolute - by definition they are all subject to it, in other words, it is good for everyone, so I think everyone should obey ". First, even with all this content rispondesssero .. and besides you can easily replicate them that if nothing prevents you from doing some assugere precetti morali a "massimo bene per l'umanità intera" del resto nulla impone che tale verità sia resa cogente: che sia imposta per via legislativa (temi bioetici cattolici in Italia) o peggio con la violenza (vedi islam radicale e le continue minacce e violenze da esso perpetrate ai danni dell'occidente e dei musulmani moderati).

E' la scissione tra morale e diritto che manca a queste concezioni della vita, la scissione tra peccato e reato. Sarebbe lungo qui ripercorrere il serrato interccio che lega diritto e morale lungo le complesse direttrici della filosofia, della sociologia e la teoria del diritto. Mi basta semplicemente ricordare che quello che mi ha sempre fatto ritenere il pensiero liberale come il migliore tra quelli attualmente elaborati è il fornire linee guida, shapes of mind più che imperativi dettagliati. In tutti i pensieri totalizzanti (tra i quali entrano a pieno titolo anche le religioni atee, come il comunismo ed i vari nazionalismi totalitari) la vita di un individuo è strettamente irregimentata in una serie di diktat, che nel loro complesso compongono una concezione secondo la quale l'individuo stesso finisce per dissolversi, nella massa dei fedeli o nelle classi sociali.

Nel pensiero liberale avviene il percorso inverso: si parte da un principio di fondo, il neminem laedere, la libertà totale finchè non si danneggiano gli altri, per poi fornire la specificazione di esso nei vari campi della vita (economico, sociale, etc.) ed eventualmente apportarvi alcuni correttivi minimi. Ma la concezione di base che pervade la vita di un liberale è un'ampio e residuale spazio per la libertà del singolo. Per questo il liberalismo è tolleranza e il pensiero confessionale è tendenzialmente imposizione. Brutalmente, il liberalismo dice: "se non crei danno ad alcuno tu sei libero di vivere come vuoi"; i pensieri totalizzanti al contrario partono negando questa premessa e dicono: "questi sono i confini entro i quali devi vivere e muoverti: entro di essi e solo entro di essi sei libero". Questi ultimi elevano rozzamente la morale a diritto ("cio che è infinitamente buono per noi DEVE esserlo per tutti") il liberalismo eleva a diritto una generale libertà e rende cogente solo ciò che violet or puts at risk.

be clear then, in my opinion is a minority of believers who understand this complex relationship between law and morality and liberal array that is fully aware that it is thanks to the West in recent centuries has made progress improving quality of life in a way unthinkable at the dawn of the modern age. It 'absolutely possible, in other words, they are believers and liberals: Liberalism does not postulate never atheism. Liberalism posits instead ALWAYS secularism, or the option granted to others to live their lives (especially the private one) as they see fit, as long as they do not create more harm to others. When most of Catholics and Muslims internalize this simple concept then also Italy and the Islamic countries will rise to a level of social and economic freedom and a tolerant attitude to their countries, often Christians, but where the separation between the sacred and the profane, church and state, has always been conceived as an essential component of quality of life. Greetings

Nintendo Ds In Bathtub

sometimes returns



Dear two readers,
return very briefly to the question of the Mass in Latin. On some video of The Republic (of which I use NOT here for membership ideological but purely as a documentary source), we can see the "before" Latin Mass (or re-post) and its "effects".

http://tv.repubblica.it/home_page.php?playmode=player&cont_id=12579

the comments of the faithful. Clearly recognize that they are non-general or generalized: there are four or five against the huge mass of all Catholics. But some of my observations seem to confirm some time ago. Why

appreciate? Answers sparse: it is old because I remember my father died, because it is richer in content (sic - but a language, whatever, is the vehicle or contents?). It is' richer and more dense, says a faithful, as they say in a chocolate cup Cameo of spins.

Who follows turns out to be even better "Who does not know Latin," according to the lord of Militia Christi, and a lady said more clearly "I must learn." And then you feel thanks for this initiative whole earth, and Pope is God and the Madonna (the latter of which we would like to see the signature on the authorization - as well as those who do not want to know when another was to thank Pope took the opposite decision!). It is always a member of the Militia Christi invites us to understand the passion, to see the film by Mel Gibson! (Fortunately, the other lady calls the Holy Scriptures).

The form prevails over substance and form, however, is a harlequin, all made of heterogeneous patches in the post-modern all-mixes, and the Mass, the Bible, movie a few years ago, with the same brush. I repeat: DVD approach.

Maybe in a few centuries there will be a Gibsonia Militia. Where a new Luther?

Valete.