Free within the category of newspapers such as El Manifesto ' Unita' , which indeed it is the consideration puo'dire right (or center-right, if you press these labels) . Newspapers, with which an audience of readers buy the ideas, or slogans, which then submits during the week, opposition papers, the piu'che information, giving his best 'when your favorite political force' in opposition and then, if that by chance (puo'capitare!) ascends to the Roman high-backed chairs, recruiting, mainly because of its thrust controversy, battles both with the opposition as with the majority, pretending to give her the branch. Newspapers in which you can 'you', from time to time, some recognize the correct position (in stercore aurum), but the simple fact that, in criticizing and always, sooner or later it hits the mark, in a country with one thousand distortions.
Free stands for its titles ranging from the sarcastic and vulgar, always accompanied by special piu'spesso vignettes (for truth 'is not very expressive, but it' a purely personal opinion). The volgarita'e'un integral part of the controversy, it is, in fact, to please the mentality '"Old Aunt" (1), which teaches good manners and extend a slap to his nephew if they spoke with his mouth full or let out a 'shit', but then saw the cartoons as an umbrella Berlusconi, who makes the gesture (the result of premature enthusiasm for opening the Senate last year) or by reading the little word 'Paraculo' recently referring to that tristanzuolo Veltroni's ride of that smug sciuri Felt 'that sends the mica to say'. The mentalita'di who sees in a non-constant threat, perhaps the root of all evil Italians, but then gloats skirt bought five euro 'by the Chinese'. The mentalita'di who would close all borders, but then if it is to assist the sick grandmother and 'very happy to call the Ukrainian underpaid caregivers. A mentality ', in short, cross-eyed, hypocritical (ne'di right ne'di left, but essentially Italiot).
Let us return to our newspaper. What should rather be called Capriccio , characterized com'e'dai piu'bizzarri whims - and realta'sempre attributable to well-defined political influence. The piu'triste that was tied to the story of Cogne, which saw the first newspaper (with the usual emphasis) and then hyper-guilty innocent, not just the defense of Ms. Franzoni was taken by his friend-of- Free Taormina, honest man hungry for fame 'and fresh flush of a charge the government (whose expulsion casus belli was the' tone 'of some of his utterances on the Justice System and that was the result of much of the controversy' As of then opposition antipathies and rivalries' internal to the then majority).
To please the mentality of 'Old Aunt above what do you do? There are many strategies. A e'quella to identify a theme and treat it 'unusual', that 'by contrarian, giving cosi'l'impressione realta'compiacendo but to go against the player's mental inertia. The rhetoric of shoot does the rest. Hence the example of the last days: in a world where the most 'beautiful ideals are unfortunately represented by idiots emeritus, understood that such sensitivity' ecology is taken 'to heart' by politicians (or other influential figures) - think the issue of global warming, Al Gore took on his shoulders and recently revived in the Italic, sciapo in his soup, the pro-environmentalist (but pro-everything, really ') Veltroni. Since 'this issue e'difeso to the specific words, with all their faults, not' infrequent that they are not caught red-handed scratching well as preach. Or, as the thesis in question is connected to a campaign, it highlights the utilitarian use (as well as a newspaper, in reality ', not' published in virtu'del just love the ideas that spread).
So what do you do that devil of a Free ? You remove the 'bales of ecologisti´: cioe´, dato che le persone che predicano la difesa dell´ ambiente (oppure, se il termine vi sembra troppo ambizioso e altisonante, ´comportamenti ambientalmente piu´corretti´) sono poco credibili e spesso, ahinoi, di sinistra, bando all´ecologismo e alla ´sudditanza mentale´ in cui ci ha indotto (ma quando? viene da chiedersi). Poiche´ tanto a Napoli la spazzatura non si divide, non dividiamola nemmeno noi! (E´ in fondo il ragionamento del leghista che non paga il canone rai per protesta contro il fatto che c´e´chi non lo paga al Sud). Poiche´ ci sono studi che potrebbero dimostrare che gli scarichi delle auto non sono poi cosi´dannosi, nel dubbio, sgasiamo piu´che possiamo con le nostre macchine, usiamole anche per andarci dalla camera al cesso, sara´un atto politico alla faccia dei sinistrorsi oltreche´una gran comodita´! Come diceva una freddura del grande Bramieri, mangiamo cacca, miliardi di mosche non possono sbagliarsi...
Ma si´, non costa niente a Feltri promuovere queste campagne, che confermano il lettore, essenzialmente, nella sua pigrizia, dando una motivazione politica a qualcosa che gia´ fa (sprecare e inquinare) e che ora assurge a gesto politico. Come i ragazzi che vanno a un concerto saltando la scuola ma che lo fanno ancor piu´ volentieri quando e´ ´per la pace´: diversi i soggetti, diverse le idee, ma il meccanismo psychological and 'the same. Returning to the theme of the environment: Felt (or his) does not say, but do not give a damn, for age reasons, if the ice melts and the radiation increases the exhaust e'cancerogeno (for charity ', not that he is the cause prince, mind you), 'cause the world so he does not have to stay there piu'quanto us, in fact, even this mechanism that I described and' one of the results of gerontocracy that, as a phenomenon piu'generale, and 'one of the true ills of Italy. And for the moment, who cares about the short term because 'in the medium sara'piu not on this Earth, just to sell copies of old aunts and impress with its case "against" and the words "clear".
Valete.
0 comments:
Post a Comment