How Long Before Date To Wax

You've Got Mail




Ovvero: una modesta e tardiva proposta di riqualificazione professionale

Una nuova pubblicazione (che francamente non ci interessa nemmeno troppo) demolisce - se stiamo alle sue recensioni - la figura di Padre Pio, il frate dei famosi . Credevamo che il FFF, ossia il fu Francesco Forgione, fosse soprattutto celebre per il miracolo della moltiplicazione delle fiction e per la lievitazione del bilancio di S. Giovanni Rotondo , ma a quanto pare ne compì anche in vita di rimarchevoli, tra cui la foratura sanguinolenta degli arti superiori (peraltro uno dei miracoli più sgradevoli che mai si ricordino).

Ebbene, il libro di nuova uscita pare rilevi un traffico sospetto di acidi varii i quali avrebbero potuto servire appunto al triste scopo di autoprocurarsi le suddette lesioni. Vabbè, a noi che interessa? Ognuno gode come può, e turlupina il prossimo con quel che gli salta in mente. Wanna Marchi , indole più solare e meno incline ai masochismi ha pensato al sale , ad esempio.

Comunque, in questo mondaccio cane dove il diavolo si nasconde ad ogni angolo, basically, all slander all (even those povericristi Ministers of Justice are targeted), and then concede that SPPDP could also be the recipient of a miracle, why not?

Messori "Catholic writer" (now part and parcel with the name, did you notice? But does anyone remember his great novel, perhaps?) Then spoke on the issue with an article in the Corriere. That makes you, including the Messori?

[http://www.corriere.it/cronache/07_ottobre_26/padre_pio_fede.shtml]

ONE. (I start from the bottom). He quotes a verse from the Gospel to the superb reason sull'inconoscibilità Operation Miracle of God, a truth that "Proved to small and simple and is hidden from the wise of the world" [cf. Lk 10:21]. This phrase, in our humble opinion, though born innocent, has become an infamous fig leaf of the Church, which is equivalent dell'orwelliano "ignorance is strength." But even if you disagree, you at least agree that it refers primarily to the words and acts of Christ, well, a bit is not 'a presumption that time, a putting the cart before the horse, this sticky in large quickly to drops of Forgione?

TWO. Instead of countering the accusation detailed simulation, as they would like the logic and honesty, Messori the raises, or misleading, even mentioning Padrepio a miracle happened to their own use and consumption ! That a letter came in one day:

If it is allowable, therefore, (and understand), a personal anecdote. A severe spastic that I have ever seen in person but with whom entertain for decades through his letters, learning much from its sensus fidei. Its desolation, years ago, for the delay in receiving mail, because of my travels and overwork, his turn to Padre Pio, which is obviously devoted [do not understand the equation, frankly! Spastic = SPPDP devotee? ] and the immediate, strong smell of strawberry that is for you the sign of being heard [er, a healing not! What are we to make of the heavenly scents?!]. The next morning, here's the letter. But the cancellation on the stamp, was sent the same day, only an hour before: between our homes and run over 300 kilometers. The exclusion by the director of the office, it was possible a mistake in tone, but unthinkable that error, however, would lead to a delay, not advance the date. Shortly after, my visit to a convent of Capuchin Lombard, an encounter with an old monk who was long the secretary of the Saint, the Gargano. In recounting the episode, no surprise, but an act of condescension: "Normal stuff, no wonder. When he had a letter that his heart told me to put it in the hole in the square, but were provided to address the guardian angels. An hour later, on time, arrived. "

Conclusion (thus also understand the reason for the choice of iconography).

Who says that when he was there (the one above) trains arriving on time is necessary to respond with Troisi, then there was no need to do head of government, it was enough stationmaster.

A Messori says that he (the one below) the letters come after a day that are generally consistent then there was no need to do saint, enough postman.

Take care.

Decorating With Black And White Comics

In the Eye of the Beholder



receive advertising and Chios

One of our readers who leave anonymous but that begins and ends D opobarba wanted to publish the following comments to post and 32 seconds, failing that, have it sent via mail:


Stir? Really? Two men held hand in hand make you stir? careful, the rhetoric is still there on vacation to send intelligence. I do root for the two old women are definitely more likeable of those two instead of the face you show your ass.
Salutoni

That spot is so bankrupt, it is intuitively clear and then explain it.

I'm glad you support and the two ladies are nice (yes, since we're in the mood for political correctness and sermonettes moral: Do not old - older ). In fact, you say, "Did you see that?" - "It seems impossible" - "In short sleeves with 'I'm cold." To make it even more transparent: the ladies show not offended by the fact that two persons of the same sex may hold hands, not therefore homophobic.

Your reaction is psychologically interesting. Assign an instinctively anti-homosexual attitudes (indeed - omoaffettiva : because that's what we see in fact in the ad: a gesture of affection ) Two elderly. In terms of compensation ass that I, even though I have a strong professional bias, I have not noticed . Also because I've never framed in full and other times when it is highlighted in the scene (hands folded, or both, walking, and there we can only guess that they also, under pants, buttocks, unless Saw the joists in two - as do the two elderly people under clothes -My God - the breast).

Obviously my (hidden) interpretation of that criticism should be taken with the tongs because I never studied psychology.

Neither Portuguese.

Salutoni.

Pontoon With Camping Enclosure

Be Extraordinary



Or: STRANGE BUT TRUE

Hear hear or rustic: the image of the late Wojtyła looms (very significant) between the flames and frozen for a photo shoot. The Courier says, "is already a miracle." (That is, he begins, see http://www.corriere.it/cronache/07_ottobre_14/papa_foto_prodigiose.shtml)

Inaccuracy Conceptually, however. A miracle is a violation, or exception, the laws of nature . Let us assume also that one day a fire (maybe even with some persistence, and not just in one of his fleeting time section from an image set) reproduce exactly the silhouette of the late pontiff, including skull and pastoral staff, well, not They include a miracle but the fact unusual.

This fact, however, stands out for its unusual generosity and useless to anyone. We know that it existed Wojtyla, in his photographs are to be found aplenty in the google search images , for example. Even in death: he had so accustomed the people to worship the effigy in a thousand sauces at the time of the funeral there was a large majority of "faithful", which shall bear to queue for hours to capture the image of the pontifical body with their cell phone. I want now is also a post-mortem gunpowder ?

greedy ... The real miracle, however, does the Courier . The photo in question in fact, save it with a click as I did to post it, bears the name of none other than "photo Pope tout court!. Blessed ... zealous

Another extraordinary fact. A priest revealed his homosexuality on television. (You know that news.) The Church with it rids clean the inside of a fervor that was never seen at such of pedophilia. We have spent even less, it should be noted that to remove other prelates engaged or married. And what do you do? Jump on the ridiculous defense that would have been a trap to fit the functional real gay men who are nestled in the priestly line (ah, then there are really!).

[http://archivio.corriere.it/archiveDocumentServlet.jsp?url=/documenti_globnet/corsera/2007/10/co_9_071014097.xml]

From whatever side you turn, this story reveals a rot, a ' inconsistency, a cowardice to fear. That is affiliated to the Catholic Church Despite the inconsistencies between her (socks) standards and their sexual orientation, you intartufa for years and then comes out half yes and half no, then those others are for efficiently purged worthy of a better cause, and he jumps up no, look what I did so you can catch the others. Edifying spectacle ever anything else! We lack only the "I have not started ...

propose then to console himself by these human misery with the immortal wisdom expressed by the hilarious scenes of the stoning in Life of Brian .

[Who discovered the analogy with the above wins a box of firelighter for new fire iconòpapi and a bag of gravel for the child]




Always look on the bright side of life!

Aluminum Fence Seconds

"A nation of illiterate" Thirty seconds

That TRIBUTE TO MONTANELLI



during night raids on youtube I find that someone, very commendably, has created a network of four episodes YET IT MOVES , PLACIDO with Benjamin and Indro MONTANELLI , broadcast in 1994. You can find them on youtube searching for words in capital letters.

Place one of the pieces, recommending peraltro la visione di tutti. E' un piacere sentire parlare (sentire insegnare dovrei dire) il grandissimo Montanelli con il contrappunto garbato e acuto di Placido. Chiarezza, profondità, originalità derivante da indipendenza di giudizio, enorme cultura. Altro che Vespe e Santori.

Nello spezzone che vedete qui sopra, anche solo a darsi la minima briga di seguirlo partendo dal minuto 3.14, si può ascoltare una riflessione chiara e coincisa sul ruolo storico rivestito dalla Chiesa Cattolica , in paragone al Protestantesimo, nel mantenere gli italiani un popolo di analfabeti . E sentite un po' che dice del latino .

Su tale analfabetismo, che persiste although still in a more insidious, we will return, but for now no words adorn I for it, not to pollute with my what you hear.

Valete.

My Dog Ate A Sanitary Napkin

... it takes lot of this very short video. When I saw I felt re-mix, first because it is very well thought out, and secondly because it is aesthetically very polite (among other things, the language, I note, remember my dialect) and third because I thought it comes from small, isolated Portugal. In the Italian "in Europe", the vaticali Prodi Ratzinger Ruini Buttiglione Bindi Binetti and Islam rampant How long must we wait?

(I have only mentioned some prominent Italian politicians, if I forgot someone please let).

[And a warm thanks to good friend Rubén ispanolusitano!]

Free 25th Birthday Games

Partibus De Animalium [2]. Among opinion leaders.


is still a monster offer to our magnifying glass. L ' columnist.

says Wikipedia: "The view is the idea that a person has about something. This is therefore an assessment and an opinion about that."

Balle . Difficult to find a more inaccurate the philosophical point of view. This jumble in the same row terms review , idea , evaluation and assessment , there are four comfortable as obese in full asthma attack in the same elevator stuck between two floors.

opinion (in spite of many misuse of the term) is precisely the result opinio, that is a form of knowledge improvised, provisional, based on incomplete. Parmenides was well aware that opposed opinion and truth, the first street and appearance of the error (even if sometimes implausible), the second being and wisdom. The review is already so much more than the vegetation but an incomplete and uncertain stage . It 's a childhood disease of the mind. There you go through and then he comes out stronger. In any case not you stop there.

Intelligent people are not ashamed to have opinions, but regret that you have more ideas. When comparing with the other rather than trying to present their reasons argued. Intelligent people to hear "opinions" turn up their noses . Far be it from them then call themselves such!

The suffix-ista, indicates membership, conform to an-ism. Dell '"opinions" no one has ever written a manifesto, but it is clear what it is. It 's that cross-cultural movement in which individual characters, which generally media exposure went to his head, taking their four views, we stick with morbid affection, and then, perhaps in a nice package (a blog, a space in a broadcast, a weekly column), the Ammannato to third parties as superfine fruits of thoughtful wisdom. Because it's easier than building spitting opinions arguments have easy game. As much easier than sticking to an opinion and taking the good opinion of others, opinion-makers also have a certain following.

but the opinion is nothing but a beetle dung. A little beat animaluzzo clinging to a ball of dry dung that when viewing images to have the entire Earth between the legs and when the roll forward to give it to others being equal to superfine pearl.

Until the columnist has the object of the game ball, the bon ton , the events of reality show, steps. But when it crosses into insettuzzo high fields such as political discussion, ethics, religion, then it is best to begin to distinguish between ideas and balls of dried poop. Wanted: pest control companies.

Valete.

Hacking Wireeless Xbox 360 Gamepad With A Cord

fleeting collection of considerations (not all mine) the afterlife and equality



as gloss ... the thoughts of yesterday.

Death is not a very good prospect . Indeed, at least I was, a prospect! It is not represented, is always the death of others. As convicts in a cell, we see others being taken away and we do not know when it's up to us (Pascal, I think). Strehler said to exorcise "the assholes just die."

Nothingness is always there, no matter if in a second or a year. It lies before us alone, puts us in a shoulder charge that no rump if ours can bring, without even we tick a box before birth : She wants to come into the world and take on the burden resulting free? YES '/ NO.

statistics if we are young we give some illusion, and old age, there is no one who is so-as Cicero said, do not believe that he will not live another year. But, mind you, not the illusion of resolving the issue, only to postpone it. In all this we must pursue a policy of Government Center: in the absence of solutions, extensions.

Religions tell us something rather than after. While philosophers argue that talk of an "after" after the end is a contradiction, like a circle square wooden iron. Wittgenstein adds that, in hindsight, even if there were an infinite life in the afterlife, would not be eliminated the enigma of life itself [Tractatus 6.4312]. Anyway I would be fine, eh?

We do not know what is the beyond of religion. When Dante tries to describe the Christian made a copy of the here, only more blood (hell and purgatory) or ethereal (paradise - ethereal I said, but you can say the same evil of the Vatican, cf. XXVII 25-27 ). John Paul II, as a last defense against criticism of the geo-anthropomorphism in which any attempt at representation inevitably expires, said that those places are rather alleged "state of mind." Purgatory it is safe to support their existence as you cling a delle ragnatele concettuali, si stiracchiano quattro versetti striminziti.

Addirittura poi il Cattolicesimo prospetta un dopo-dopo-dopo! Una resurrezione dei corpi che è uno dei punti più imbarazzanti del credo (e infatti nel catechismo ufficiale si dice che è irrappresentabile e si tira via veloci veloci sperando che qualcuno non salti su a far troppe domande). Chiedetene un po’ ai vostri amici cattolici che cosa ne sanno.

Più concreto è il paradiso dei Musulmani. Un posto bellissimo, una specie di oasi piena di frescura, di ombra e di acqua (e te lo credo che ha originariamente allettato delle popolazioni beduine) in cui, oltre alle sette (o settantasette?) vergini, ci sono anche dei bei “garzoni” (così Bausani traduce pudicamente quella che è un’effettiva traccia di pederastia alla greca nelle Parole del Clemente e Misericordioso , il Quale evidentemente provvede anche a coloro i cui occhi godono delle forme maschili [LVI, 17] in barba a Ahmadinejad che invece li impicca). Ci viene assicurato che là non avremo mal di testa [ sic - LVI 19] e speriamo allora nemmeno il raffreddore o la costipazione.

Ma a quanto pare, qualunque cosa sia, che cosa succede nell'aldilà a ciascuno dipende da come ci è comportati qui, nel non-ancora-di-là. C'è un rapporto causa-effetto: se ti sei impegnato, passi, se no ti bocciano (with the purgatory of the Catholic who is a bit 'as exams repair). And the failure is unpleasant, we speak of fire, or if you are a bit more refined, à la Wojtyla, separation from God of course, God always has a discretionary right, can in turn change things and remove departed from their homes as carriarmatini on the board of Risk, if you like. Would you say my Irish friend: "God can do whatever she wants"! How did Ratzinger (who in this was good rival, earthly image of (a) Superior) when he pulled the children out on a limb. Limbo that simply was finally dropped because indefensible ancor più fragile del purgatorio.

Di inferno si parla meno , anche se si ricevono in udienza dittatori che sicuramente lo meriteranno, o forse proprio per non metterli in imbarazzo. Per sentire due parole al proposito c'è da ascoltare Radio Maria con l'ineffabile Don Fanzaga. Ma mai ad personam , quelle parole, si intende! C'è quasi una pruderie per la dannazione, si dice che lo sa poi Dio se qualcuno se la merita e perché. Lo stesso non vale per il paradiso dove invece si va con nome e cognome, con tanto di carte bollate e di gigantografie in Piazza S. Pietro. Un po' più coerenti i Musulmani che, forse perché non yet gone through a historic phase-social-media-gooders, we send the infidels to hell and say explicitly saying that the day will be in Paradise with the Prophet (So in general, before making a large). The Jews however, as they are taken from their land problems, the afterlife do not think too much, it is important that you do here and now. Religion in the injury often associated with the calculation and trade and those who, with the afterlife, it's less speculation such as "this in exchange for that." Today the most famous Jewish saying about death is that of Woody Allen that says that is not afraid but would not want to be there when happens to him. It will be that the rabbis, fine reasoners, unlike the priests and Muslim scholars have understood that there is little that is puzzling and shameful bargain.


But back to paradise. And imagine we believe there is.

passarsela evil I have seen so many people here on Earth which is the place where I always was. Passarsela even worse than me, mind you (though I do not deserve heaven, so do not text) and was doing worse than the popes, bishops, cardinals, of reginedinghilterra, the georgebush, the binladen, of Nasrallah. Or even the families of the Christian fundamentalist bible belt going to thank pick up in the Lord . Or the ladies with the hair shirt. O cycling of small families to "tell the family." O Papaboys they pay to travel to participate in the antipodes Godstock (or Popestock - that God is not known fact that the Pope appears there is some).

And then, they enjoy themselves on earth, are fine, and then in later, should be even better? I feel like saying: there is PURE heaven!? You had everything and now you want that too, for ever? What injustice!

While those who've been hurt in life, maybe yes, we go to heaven, but the memories of terrible life over? For example, with the memories of leprosy patita a Calcutta? O dei dolori lancinanti che se li son portati via in tenera età? O del Lager in cui son stati fatti fuori come bestie? Sì, dico con i ricordi , lo devo assumere, perché se si cancellano o modificano quelli si cancella o modifica l'identità e in tal caso sarebbe come se andasse in paradiso qualcun'altro! [1]. E con i ricordi traslocano in cielo le ingiustizie terrene.

Meglio quindi se non c’è niente. Nel nulla io, nel nulla i miserabili, ma con tutti i pasciuti filistei!

(E lo so che è una magra consolazione).

Valete .

[1] Ma questo forse è un ragionamento troppo filosofico theologians to the Vatican, better to spend the treasures of the intellect in search of miracles to bring the processes of beatification and sainthood.

Zero Zwt-328 Walkie Talkie

A modest critical thinking in relation to the concept of religious freedom



[... followed by an equally modest eulogy of liberalism]

Mea culpa . I should have been more cautious, but there are fallen. I started a discussion in detail the relationship between Islam and freedom (and so, some time ago, I discussed with specific examples of the relationship between Catholicism and Freedom). And discuss in detail means to stimulate research by the interlocutor of counterexamples. For an imam who gives the death fatwa against Salman Rushdie, there is one they stayed in his house to protect it. For someone who does not move a finger against female circumcision, there is one that is mitered to the contrary. And so on. For us, a priest who thunders against homosexuals, there is one who hopes even legal recognition (rare, but possible). And so on.

I linger still a paragraph on female genital mutilation. The persistence of infibulation, as I speak, we have, after all, in society permeated by Islam. Since this practice is abhorrent and cruel, and also has no scriptural basis (in fact, I remember that there are evidences to the contrary in the tradition as the behavior of the Prophet with his daughters), it is assumed that in a society, again, heavily influenced by religion, such a custom should be gone for a while '. If remained (and remains) so long means that authorities can influence it more (that is, those religious ) have moved little . This insensitivity, I believe - an insensitivity to the woman who (I suspect) is structural in Islam (as in his religious sisters or sisters if you like). Since from a purely anatomical point of view, what characterizes a woman is the possession ( inter alia ) Of a vagina, if it continues a practice designed to maim and that also proves to be the bearer of diseases and mechanical problems (not even speak of the woman's pleasure, if you bother: just procreative union), well, if it persists Such despite being painful and unnecessary, and this has been for generations and generations of women, it is really that there is a very good dose of indifference and inertia to impede the removal. And even more responsible are those religious authorities who have the power to shape opinions and thus behavior. And doubly responsible if the practice goes against religion.

In the debate between me and the two readers of faith islamica sembra emergere uno strano Islam . Siamo abituati, in Occidente, a parlare di Paesi islamici. Ora si scopre, discutendo con queste gentili interlocutrici, che in realtà, quei Paesi, davvero “islamici” non sono, perché se lo fossero ben altri sarebbero i comportamenti e le leggi vigenti . Insomma, l’Islam sarebbe in qualche modo assente e presente. Se un comportamento è criticato lo si distacca immediatamente dalla religione dicendo “ma quello non è il vero Islam”. Bene, dico io, questo è consolante. Allora dobbiamo presupporre che l’Islam sia un atteggiamento tutto sommato a mal partito in quegli Stati (e sono tanti) dove si governa sulla base di una discendenza and where the Prophet is accompanied by the name of the State, the adjective "Islamic". So far, in line hypothetical, I can follow you. If there is a possibility of translating Islam in politics, so that it does not necessarily go hand in hand with authoritarianism (but I doubt it) and a series of bad uses such as the death penalty, el ' oppression of non-co-religionists, so be it. But, again, due to the content of the Qur'an ( in particular its central concept of jihad , which also allows concrete and violent interpretation ) I have little confidence. Grant me that at least in centuries of history has not really had much demonstration of such a possibility.

This game of hide and seek ("Yes, that behavior X is horrible but that's not true Islam / Christianity / Judaism / Communities, please note that in fact the case of Muslim / Christian / jew / communist that he / she said exactly the Unlike X ... ") applies to all faiths . You do not come to an end (although, I repeat, then the sum total of historical responsibilities down talk of religions).

I'm still willing to discuss in detail the individual behaviors, individual verses and individual interpretations. But for now we leave in a corner this spring-and-rolls and we also see the What a couple of other perspectives. That individual first. Religion has no doubt an important role in the spirituality of the individual, for its balance. Our readers have mentioned the relief that a conversion, embracing a faith entails. And I deeply understand these sentiments, and even more confusion and anguish of those who preceded them and respect them for it. A faith gives great power . Surely the days are more peaceful for those who believe in a Supreme Being who sees and provides, for those who trust in the ultimate justice or who are convinced of the individual survival of the soul after death.

Only that faith gives strength eccessiva . Poiché si tratta, in origine, del rapporto individuale con un Essere Superiore, si finisce col legittimare tutto quello che a quell’Essere, alle Sue parole, è fatto risalire . Parole che però si contraddicono, o tra religione e religione o all’interno di una stessa religione quando vi sono nei testi sacri diverse interpretazioni possibili (e dove non ci sono?). Nonostante questo (e passiamo dalla prospettiva individuale a quella collettiva) si comincia col tracciare una linea tra fedele e infedele, la linea diventa dislivello di valori, e poi ci si sente giustificati ad ammazzare o almeno opprimere e disprezzare il secondo. E’ spesso stato detto, riprendendo una citazione (Misinterpreted) of Dostoevsky, that atheism is to be rejected because, without God, anything is possible. Acutely did however observe a contemporary French philosopher, because there is no God, everything becomes possible . Dire Deus vult, but sha 'Allah becomes the blanket to cover every wickedness and cement to reinforce the status quo each harmful to anyone, individual or cateogorie.


Religion creates unpleasant elective affinities (to use an understatement ). Our young reader and interlocutor Asyia Fatima is very likely to be a loving and gentle person, but on his blogs we also find room for Osama bin Laden, which, of course, is not a balanced picture and harmless. Some time ago one of our Catholic readers, which is certainly far from meeting the colonial wars or expulsion of Jewish communities, proved lenient towards a movement that mixes Catholicism (a little) and fascism (a lot) because basically they are co-religionists.

And again. You may also think that September 11 is not a purely religious event of the matrix, which is an event of war (and hence political) with a veneer of Islam, but certainly, if someone had the guts to crash into a villain by skyscraper out of many people is high because was extremely sure of finding something wonderful after death. And also, if they believed a bit 'less and immortality of the soul to heaven, much less young and ignorant American soldiers headed off to shoot the inhabitants of countries that would not be able to find on a map outline . I know it sounds idealistic, but perhaps the wars as the Iraq war would stop, despite the high wages, though there was some sort of objection mass due to the fear of losing, with the skin, really all there is to lose .

Religions tell us so that the human being is weak and fallible, in comparison to the Supreme Being, but then, alas, justify all the actions that, by that human weak and fallible, are perpetrated in the name of the Supreme same. Never mind that there is a central authority (the Pope) or that there are many (like the wise of Islam - which is even worse because it increases the confusion), what matters is that, in the name of God, those authorities did not budge an inch. God becomes the tool of any doctrinaire stiffening. In this sense, the concepts of kindness, tolerance and freedom which are derived from religion and lived by their representatives, although in fact positive, however distorted, sick.

Il liberalismo arriva ad un concetto di rispetto che è di ben altra fattura. Occorre dare spazio ad ognuno perché, ciascuno, potenzialmente, potrebbe avere ragione, fallibili e deboli come siamo. Che ciascuno sia ascoltato, che ciascuno contribuisca, che nessuno ammazzi od opprima nessuno in nome della propria posizione. Per dirla con von Hayek “La libertà è l’essenziale per far posto all’imprevedibile e all’impredicibile; ne abbiamo bisogno perché, come abbiamo imparato, da essa nascono le occasioni per raggiungere molti dei nostri obiettivi. Siccome ogni individuo sa poco, e, in particolare, raramente sa chi di noi sa fare meglio, ci affidiamo agli sforzi indipendenti e concorrenti dei molti to propitiate the birth of what we desire when we see "[1].

E 'reasoning with a fund of appreciation for the chance: one hundred schools should not compare it to flourish and then crush them better (as he did in China who made use of this metaphor), but because we humbly recognize that each other may be right, the more you contribute the more you raise the chances of improvement. E 'appreciation of the cooperation, mutual aid, higher education, paradoxically, that of communism . And many schools will contradict and, perhaps, as theologians and wise men of religion, but none will be entitled to knife or marginalize those belonging to another. We share the bizarre and perhaps even sad human condition. Let's listen and possibly give us a hand, and that no one tells us that his personal relationship with a Higher Being (which may also exist, who knows) authorizes him to weigh only an ounce more than the others.

Communism is not about God, but not even be aware of the fallibility and limitations of the human being as his essential (that is a kind of paradise end of the story), so then is embarrassed to explain why historical events have arisen as a communist or have failed diverted. Liberalism concedes, however, that we are made of hardwood and wrong, hard to shape, and avoids any personality cult or super-personality, therefore, did not even embarrassing to acknowledge that there may be (and must be fought! ) or its deviant forms in which pretext of "liberalism" is the name. And do not apologize because in the end there is a similarity at least verbal or a distant relationship.

Valete.

[1] Friedrich A. von Hayek, The free society, cit. in D. Antiseri, Preface to FA von Hayek, Individualism : the real one and the false, Rubbettino 1997 (Italian edition of Individualism: true and false , 1949), p. 29.
{Yes, Beiderbecke, I shall return, but see now that I treasure!}